音楽療法士
ヘルスケアAI露出度
- データ出典: BLS公表時点: 2026-08
高い· 相対
低い4段階の相対区分非常に高い職業群単位の値
尺度・母数・出典
4段階の相対区分（低い / 中程度 / 高い / 非常に高い）
BLS雇用見通し表の詳細職業831件が母数。値は NEM(全国雇用マトリクス)コード単位で付与されるため、同じ NEM コードの職業は同じバンドになります
- データ出典: Anthropic公表時点: 2026-03
0.040
0.000ここに掲載された値の範囲0.745尺度・母数・出典
- データ出典: ILO公表時点: 2025
0.20
0.09ここに掲載された値の範囲0.70職業群単位の値
尺度・母数・出典
生成AI露出度指数、公開されたまま0–1
ISCO-08の職業小分類単位 — 同じコードの職業はすべて同じ値
当サイトの算出であり、ILOが公表した数値ではありません。当サイトがILOデータセットに結び付けた職業1,012件のうち、この値以上のものは86%です。
この出典がどのような性格の値か
BLSの区分は絶対水準ではなく相対順位であり、一次測定でもありません。複数の既存研究が付けた職業別パーセンタイル順位を4段階にまとめた値です。雇用や賃金の予測でもなく、導入確率でもなく、自動化と増強を区別しません。
Task-level exposure
露出のある作業のみValues in this tab are predicted labels, not observations. Eloundou et al. (2023) published two rating regimes — human raters and GPT-4 — and the β shown here is derived from the GPT-4 rater basis alone; the same task can take a different value under the other regime. The unit and the meaning differ from the observed shares (%) in the other tabs, so do not place them on the same axis.
| Task | βE1 + 0.5 × E2 |
|---|---|
Observe and document client reactions, progress, or other outcomes related to music therapy.O*NET Task ID 19176 | 1.0 |
Document evaluations, treatment plans, case summaries, or progress or other reports related to individual clients or client groups.O*NET Task ID 19182 | 1.0 |
Compose, arrange, or adapt music for music therapy treatments.O*NET Task ID 19184 | 1.0 |
Participate in continuing education.O*NET Task ID 20167 | 1.0 |
Adapt existing or develop new music therapy assessment instruments or procedures to meet an individual client's needs.O*NET Task ID 19164 | 0.5 |
Analyze data to determine the effectiveness of specific treatments or therapy approaches.O*NET Task ID 19165 | 0.5 |
Analyze or synthesize client data to draw conclusions or make recommendations for therapy.O*NET Task ID 19166 | 0.5 |
Communicate client assessment findings and recommendations in oral, written, audio, video, or other forms.O*NET Task ID 19168 | 0.5 |
Confer with professionals on client's treatment team to develop, coordinate, or integrate treatment plans.O*NET Task ID 19169 | 0.5 |
Customize treatment programs for specific areas of music therapy, such as intellectual or developmental disabilities, educational settings, geriatrics, medical settings, mental health, physical disabilities, or wellness.O*NET Task ID 19170 | 0.5 |
Assess client functioning levels, strengths, and areas of need in terms of perceptual, sensory, affective, communicative, musical, physical, cognitive, social, spiritual, or other abilities.O*NET Task ID 19167 | 0.0 |
Improvise instrumentally, vocally, or physically to meet client's therapeutic needs.O*NET Task ID 19175 | 0.0 |
Communicate with clients to build rapport, acknowledge their progress, or reflect upon their reactions to musical experiences.O*NET Task ID 19181 | 0.0 |
Assess the risks and benefits of treatment termination for clients.O*NET Task ID 19183 | 0.0 |
Conduct information sharing sessions, such as in-service workshops for other professionals, potential client groups, or the general community.O*NET Task ID 19185 | 0.0 |
Identify and respond to emergency physical or mental health situations.O*NET Task ID 19187 | 0.0 |
Integrate behavioral, developmental, improvisational, medical, or neurological approaches into music therapy treatments.O*NET Task ID 19188 | 0.0 |
Supervise staff, volunteers, practicum students, or interns engaged in music therapy activities.O*NET Task ID 19190 | 0.0 |
β = E1 + 0.5 × E2 · E1 = tasks where direct LLM access alone cuts time by at least 50%, E2 = tasks where software built on top of an LLM cuts time by at least 50%. Values take only 0 / 0.5 / 1.0.
Data sources & licenses — O*NET®, Eloundou et al. (2023): see full notices on the Credits page