Softwareentwickler
Computer und MathematikKI-Exposition
- Datenquelle: BLSVeröffentlicht: '26.08
Sehr hoch· relativ
NiedrigVier relative BänderSehr hochWert auf Berufsgruppenebene
Skala, Bezugsmenge und Quelle
Vier relative Bänder (Niedrig / Mittel / Hoch / Sehr hoch)
831 detaillierte Berufe in der BLS-Beschäftigungsprojektionstabelle. Der Wert wird je Code der National Employment Matrix (NEM) vergeben, daher erhalten Berufe mit demselben NEM-Code dasselbe Band
- Datenquelle: AnthropicVeröffentlicht: '26.03
0.288
0.000Spannweite der hier geführten Werte0.745Skala, Bezugsmenge und Quelle
Index der beobachteten Exposition, 0–1 wie veröffentlicht
Auf O*NET-Aufgaben abgebildet
- Datenquelle: ILOVeröffentlicht: '25
0.53
0.09Spannweite der hier geführten Werte0.70Wert auf Berufsgruppenebene
Skala, Bezugsmenge und Quelle
Index der Exposition gegenüber generativer KI, 0–1 wie veröffentlicht
ISCO-08-Berufsgattung — alle Berufe mit demselben Code erhalten diesen Wert
Von dieser Website berechnet, nicht von der IAO veröffentlicht: Von den 1.012 Berufen, die diese Website mit dem IAO-Datensatz verknüpft, erreichen oder übertreffen 14% diesen Wert.
Welche Art von Wert diese Quelle veröffentlicht
Die Kategorie von BLS ist ein relativer Rang und kein absolutes Niveau, und sie ist keine eigene Messung: Sie fasst die Perzentilränge des Berufs aus mehreren veröffentlichten Studien in vier Bänder zusammen. Sie ist weder eine Beschäftigungs- oder Lohnprognose noch eine Einführungswahrscheinlichkeit und unterscheidet nicht zwischen Automatisierung und Augmentierung.
Task-level exposure
10 ausgeblendete Aufgaben anzeigen| Task | Claude.aiRaw / share % |
|---|---|
Modify existing software to correct errors, to adapt it to new hardware, or to upgrade interfaces and improve performance.15-1133 | 4.794255.1 |
Modify existing software to correct errors, allow it to adapt to new hardware, or to improve its performance.15-1132 | 2.519228.9 |
Analyze user needs and software requirements to determine feasibility of design within time and cost constraints.15-1132 | 0.30153.5 |
Store, retrieve, and manipulate data for analysis of system capabilities and requirements.15-1133 | 0.28733.3 |
Design, develop and modify software systems, using scientific analysis and mathematical models to predict and measure outcome and consequences of design.15-1132 | 0.19222.2 |
Design or develop software systems, using scientific analysis and mathematical models to predict and measure outcome and consequences of design.15-1133 | 0.14921.7 |
Analyze information to determine, recommend, and plan computer specifications and layouts, and peripheral equipment modifications.15-1132 | 0.09691.1 |
Consult with customers about software system design and maintenance.15-1132 | 0.08301.0 |
Analyze information to determine, recommend, and plan installation of a new system or modification of an existing system.15-1133 | 0.05340.6 |
Develop and direct software system testing and validation procedures, programming, and documentation.15-1132 | 0.04870.6 |
Values in this tab are predicted labels, not observations. Eloundou et al. (2023) published two rating regimes — human raters and GPT-4 — and the β shown here is derived from the GPT-4 rater basis alone; the same task can take a different value under the other regime. The unit and the meaning differ from the observed shares (%) in the other tabs, so do not place them on the same axis.
| Task | βE1 + 0.5 × E2 |
|---|---|
Analyze information to determine, recommend, and plan installation of a new system or modification of an existing system.O*NET Task ID 21661 | 1.0 |
Analyze user needs and software requirements to determine feasibility of design within time and cost constraints.O*NET Task ID 21662 | 1.0 |
Confer with systems analysts, engineers, programmers and others to design systems and to obtain information on project limitations and capabilities, performance requirements and interfaces.O*NET Task ID 21664 | 1.0 |
Coordinate installation of software system.O*NET Task ID 21666 | 1.0 |
Design, develop and modify software systems, using scientific analysis and mathematical models to predict and measure outcomes and consequences of design.O*NET Task ID 21667 | 1.0 |
Determine system performance standards.O*NET Task ID 21668 | 1.0 |
Develop or direct software system testing or validation procedures, programming, or documentation.O*NET Task ID 21669 | 1.0 |
Modify existing software to correct errors, adapt it to new hardware, or upgrade interfaces and improve performance.O*NET Task ID 21670 | 1.0 |
Monitor functioning of equipment to ensure system operates in conformance with specifications.O*NET Task ID 21671 | 1.0 |
Obtain and evaluate information on factors such as reporting formats required, costs, or security needs to determine hardware configuration.O*NET Task ID 21672 | 1.0 |
β = E1 + 0.5 × E2 · E1 = tasks where direct LLM access alone cuts time by at least 50%, E2 = tasks where software built on top of an LLM cuts time by at least 50%. Values take only 0 / 0.5 / 1.0.
Data sources & licenses — O*NET®, Anthropic Economic Index, Eloundou et al. (2023): see full notices on the Credits page
Occupation information
Aktuelle Veränderungen mit Bezug zu diesem Beruf
Juli 2026: ADP/Stanford linked postings-payroll study of ~7,000 IT workers (2019-2025) prices tasks separately within IT jobs. Advising others on the design or use of technologies is among 8 higher-wage activities; five tasks lost compensation value in 2023-2025 vs 2019-2022, including "develop models of systems, processes, or products." Effect sizes were not published.
[Quelle: ADP Research / Stanford Digital Economy Lab, Unbundling Jobs (July 2026)]Juni 2026: Cited by ADP Research as an example of a high-AI-exposure occupation. Group-level payroll data shows employment in high-exposure occupations down 0.2% year over year overall and down 4.3% for workers aged 22-25 (33rd consecutive monthly decline). The percentages are for the high-exposure group, not for this occupation alone.
[Quelle: ADP Research, Canaries Dashboard (June 2026)]Apr. 2026: Korean youth employment data shows codified knowledge work most vulnerable to AI displacement. Professional/technical services lost 98,000 workers in Jan 2026 (worst since 2013). Entry-level coding tasks at highest risk.
[Quelle: Econmingle / National Assembly Budget Office (2026)]