Ingenieurs de Recherche
Informatique et MathématiquesExposition à l'IA
- Source des données: BLSPublié: 2026-08
Très élevée· relative
FaibleQuatre bandes relativesTrès élevéeValeur par groupe professionnel
Échelle, base et source
Quatre bandes relatives (Faible / Modérée / Élevée / Très élevée)
831 métiers détaillés du tableau des projections d'emploi du BLS. La valeur est attribuée par code de la National Employment Matrix (NEM), si bien que les métiers partageant un code NEM reçoivent la même bande
- Source des données: AnthropicPublié: 2026-03
0.288
0.000Étendue des valeurs présentées ici0.745Échelle, base et source
- Source des données: ILOPublié: 2025
0.53
0.09Étendue des valeurs présentées ici0.70Valeur par groupe professionnel
Échelle, base et source
Indice d'exposition à l'IA générative, 0–1 tel que publié
Groupe de base CITP-08 — tous les métiers partageant le code reçoivent cette valeur
Calculé par ce site, non publié par l'OIT : sur les 1 012 professions que ce site relie au jeu de données de l'OIT, 14% atteignent ou dépassent cette valeur.
Quelle est la nature de la valeur publiée par cette source
La catégorie BLS est un rang relatif et non un niveau absolu, et ce n'est pas une mesure de première main : elle regroupe en quatre bandes les rangs centiles du métier dans plusieurs études publiées. Ce n'est ni une prévision d'emploi ou de salaire, ni une probabilité d'adoption, et elle ne distingue pas automatisation et augmentation.
Task-level exposure
Afficher 9 tâches masquées| Task | Claude.aiRaw / share % | APIRaw / share % |
|---|---|---|
Modify existing software to correct errors, adapt it to new hardware, or upgrade interfaces and improve performance.15-1252 | 0.200057.1 | 0.340073.9 |
Prepare reports or correspondence concerning project specifications, activities, or status.15-1252 | 0.050014.3 | 0.02004.3 |
Consult with customers or other departments on project status, proposals, or technical issues, such as software system design or maintenance.15-1252 | 0.040011.4 | 0.02004.3 |
Analyze information to determine, recommend, and plan installation of a new system or modification of an existing system.15-1252 | 0.03008.6 | 0.03006.5 |
Analyze user needs and software requirements to determine feasibility of design within time and cost constraints.15-1252 | 0.01002.9 | 0.02004.3 |
Store, retrieve, and manipulate data for analysis of system capabilities and requirements.15-1252 | 0.01002.9 | 0.02004.3 |
Design, develop and modify software systems, using scientific analysis and mathematical models to predict and measure outcomes and consequences of design.15-1252 | 0.01002.9 | 0.00000.0 |
Obtain and evaluate information on factors such as reporting formats required, costs, or security needs to determine hardware configuration. | —0 | 0.01002.2 |
Values in this tab are predicted labels, not observations. Eloundou et al. (2023) published two rating regimes — human raters and GPT-4 — and the β shown here is derived from the GPT-4 rater basis alone; the same task can take a different value under the other regime. The unit and the meaning differ from the observed shares (%) in the other tabs, so do not place them on the same axis.
| Task | βE1 + 0.5 × E2 |
|---|---|
Analyze information to determine, recommend, and plan installation of a new system or modification of an existing system.O*NET Task ID 21661 | 1.0 |
Analyze user needs and software requirements to determine feasibility of design within time and cost constraints.O*NET Task ID 21662 | 1.0 |
Confer with systems analysts, engineers, programmers and others to design systems and to obtain information on project limitations and capabilities, performance requirements and interfaces.O*NET Task ID 21664 | 1.0 |
Coordinate installation of software system.O*NET Task ID 21666 | 1.0 |
Design, develop and modify software systems, using scientific analysis and mathematical models to predict and measure outcomes and consequences of design.O*NET Task ID 21667 | 1.0 |
Determine system performance standards.O*NET Task ID 21668 | 1.0 |
Develop or direct software system testing or validation procedures, programming, or documentation.O*NET Task ID 21669 | 1.0 |
Modify existing software to correct errors, adapt it to new hardware, or upgrade interfaces and improve performance.O*NET Task ID 21670 | 1.0 |
Monitor functioning of equipment to ensure system operates in conformance with specifications.O*NET Task ID 21671 | 1.0 |
Obtain and evaluate information on factors such as reporting formats required, costs, or security needs to determine hardware configuration.O*NET Task ID 21672 | 1.0 |
β = E1 + 0.5 × E2 · E1 = tasks where direct LLM access alone cuts time by at least 50%, E2 = tasks where software built on top of an LLM cuts time by at least 50%. Values take only 0 / 0.5 / 1.0.
Data sources & licenses — O*NET®, Anthropic Economic Index, Eloundou et al. (2023): see full notices on the Credits page
Informations professionnelles
Évolutions récentes concernant ce métier
juil. 2026: ADP/Stanford linked postings-payroll study of ~7,000 IT workers (2019-2025) prices tasks separately within IT jobs. Advising others on the design or use of technologies is among 8 higher-wage activities; five tasks lost compensation value in 2023-2025 vs 2019-2022, including "develop models of systems, processes, or products." Effect sizes were not published.
[Source: ADP Research / Stanford Digital Economy Lab, Unbundling Jobs (July 2026)]mars 2026: EIG (Mar 2026) argues the weakness in young adults' labor market is about age, not education: young workers of all education levels lag the rest of the labor market, which does not fit the media narrative of AI displacing computer science majors and entry-level graduates.
[Source: EIG: AI and Young-Adult Jobs (March 2026)]mars 2026: Brookings (Mar 2026) says research on AI and the labor market is still in its first inning, and studies disagree: ADP payroll data show employment fell more for young workers in high-AI-exposure occupations, while CPS data show unemployment rose less for workers in more exposed occupations.
[Source: Brookings Institution]These summaries were written by AI Changing Work from the source linked with each one, and any figures in them are given as AI Changing Work summarised them; they can differ from the source's own wording and from figures shown elsewhere on this page, so check the source before relying on them. AI Changing Work matched this page's occupation to an O*NET occupation and chose, by its own judgment, case by case, which summaries relate to that O*NET occupation; a summary appearing here does not mean that its source names this occupation.