Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers

O*NET-SOC コード: 15-1253.00

Develop and execute software tests to identify software problems and their causes. Test system modifications to prepare for implementation. Document software and application defects using a bug tracking system and report defects to software or web developers. Create and maintain databases of known defects. May participate in software design reviews to provide input on functional requirements, operational characteristics, product designs, and schedules.

データ出典: BLS公表時点: 2026-08
非常に高い· 相対
低い4段階の相対区分非常に高い
職業群単位の値
尺度・母数・出典
4段階の相対区分（低い / 中程度 / 高い / 非常に高い）
BLS雇用見通し表の詳細職業831件が母数。値は NEM(全国雇用マトリクス)コード単位で付与されるため、同じ NEM コードの職業は同じバンドになります
出典データセット（XLSX ファイルのダウンロード）
データ出典: Anthropic公表時点: 2026-03
0.520
0.000ここに掲載された値の範囲0.745
尺度・母数・出典
観測エクスポージャー指数、公開されたまま0–1
O*NETタスクへの対応づけが基準
SOC 2018の職業単位で公表された値で、同じSOC 2018コードを持つO*NET職業はすべてこの値になります
出典データセット（CSV ファイルのダウンロード）
データ出典: ILO公表時点: 2025
0.49–0.55· ISCO-08職業グループ3件
尺度・母数・出典
生成AI露出度指数、公開されたまま0–1
ISCO-08の細分類（4桁）単位で公表された値です。米国労働統計局（BLS）の公式対応表（ISCO-08→2010 SOC、2010 SOC→2018 SOC）を公表どおり適用してこの職業に結び付けており、対応は全部または一部です
出典データセット（PDF ファイルのダウンロード）

この出典がどのような性格の値か

BLSの区分は絶対水準ではなく相対順位であり、一次測定でもありません。複数の既存研究が付けた職業別パーセンタイル順位を4段階にまとめた値です。雇用や賃金の予測でもなく、導入確率でもなく、自動化と増強を区別しません。

結び付けたISCO-08グループごとのILO値

ISCO-08 2512Software Developers0.53
ISCO-08 2519Software and Applications Developers and Analysts Not Elsewhere Classified0.55
ISCO-08 2529Database and Network Professionals Not Elsewhere Classified0.49

Task-level exposure

露出のある作業のみ

評価済みタスク 30 件 · β ≥ 0.5 のタスク 28 件（93.3%）

β = 直接的な露出（E1）+ 0.5 × ツール利用時の露出（E2）。原典リポジトリの定義に従います。

原典の単位：O*NET 27.2 のタスク → O*NET 31.0 の職業コード
評価済みタスクはすべて O*NET 31.0 のタスク一覧にあります。

出典: OpenAI "GPTs are GPTs" exposure rubric
版: gh-main-0471612
ライセンス: MIT License, Copyright (c) 2024 OpenAI

Task (O*NET 30.2)	Claude.aiRaw / share %	APIRaw / share %
Identify, analyze, and document problems with program function, output, online screen, or content. 15-1253.00	0.910071.7	1.620069.2
Modify existing software to correct errors, allow it to adapt to new hardware, or to improve its performance. 15-1253.00	0.190015.0	0.340014.5
Provide feedback and recommendations to developers on software usability and functionality. 15-1253.00	0.07005.5	0.02000.9
Collaborate with field staff or customers to evaluate or diagnose problems and recommend possible solutions. 15-1253.00	0.04003.1	0.01000.4
Monitor program performance to ensure efficient and problem-free operations. 15-1253.00	0.03002.4	0.20008.5
Identify program deviance from standards, and suggest modifications to ensure compliance. 15-1253.00	0.02001.6	0.03001.3
Perform initial debugging procedures by reviewing configuration files, logs, or code pieces to determine breakdown source. 15-1253.00	0.01000.8	0.07003.0
Test system modifications to prepare for implementation. 15-1253.00	0.00000.0	0.02000.9
Document software defects, using a bug tracking system, and report defects to software developers. 15-1253.00	0.00000.0	0.01000.4
Monitor bug resolution efforts and track successes. 15-1253.00	0.00000.0	0.01000.4
Participate in product design reviews to provide input on functional requirements, product designs, schedules, or potential problems. 15-1253.00	0.00000.0	0.00000.0
Document test procedures to ensure replicability and compliance with standards. 15-1253.00	0.00000.0	0.00000.0
Develop or specify standards, methods, or procedures to determine product quality or release readiness. 15-1253.00	0.00000.0	0.00000.0
Investigate customer problems referred by technical support. 15-1253.00	0.00000.0	0.00000.0
Install and configure recreations of software production environments to allow testing of software performance. 15-1253.00	0.00000.0	0.00000.0
Evaluate or recommend software for testing or bug tracking. 15-1253.00	0.00000.0	0.00000.0
Conduct historical analyses of test results. 15-1253.00	0.00000.0	—0
Design test plans, scenarios, scripts, or procedures.	—0	0.01000.4
他 1 件の作業を表示 ▾折りたたむ ▴
Develop testing programs that address areas such as database impacts, software scenarios, regression testing, negative testing, error or bug retests, or usability.	—0	0.00000.0
Plan test schedules or strategies in accordance with project scope or delivery dates.	—0	0.00000.0
Install, maintain, or use software testing programs.	—0	0.00000.0
Conduct software compatibility tests with programs, hardware, operating systems, or network environments.	—0	0.00000.0
Coordinate user or third-party testing.	—0	0.00000.0
Not observed on any surface — 7 task(s) — These tasks have no row in the source for this release. The 0 in the share row is a display-stage composition ratio; absence is what the — in the raw row states.
Create or maintain databases of known test defects.	—0	—0
Review software documentation to ensure technical accuracy, compliance, or completeness, or to mitigate risks.	—0	—0
Update automated test scripts to ensure currency.	—0	—0
Design or develop automated testing tools.	—0	—0
Visit beta testing sites to evaluate software performance.	—0	—0
Recommend purchase of equipment to control dust, temperature, or humidity in area of system installation.	—0	—0
Store, retrieve, and manipulate data for analysis of system capabilities and requirements.	—0	—0

Values in this tab are predicted labels, not observations. Eloundou et al. (2023) published two rating regimes — human raters and GPT-4 — and the β shown here is derived from the GPT-4 rater basis alone; the same task can take a different value under the other regime. The unit and the meaning differ from the observed shares (%) in the other tabs, so do not place them on the same axis.

Task (O*NET 27.2)	βE1 + 0.5 × E2
Design test plans, scenarios, scripts, or procedures. O*NET Task ID 14638	1.0
Test system modifications to prepare for implementation. O*NET Task ID 14639	1.0
Develop testing programs that address areas such as database impacts, software scenarios, regression testing, negative testing, error or bug retests, or usability. O*NET Task ID 14640	1.0
Document software defects, using a bug tracking system, and report defects to software developers. O*NET Task ID 14641	1.0
Identify, analyze, and document problems with program function, output, online screen, or content. O*NET Task ID 14642	1.0
Monitor bug resolution efforts and track successes. O*NET Task ID 14643	1.0
Create or maintain databases of known test defects. O*NET Task ID 14644	1.0
Plan test schedules or strategies in accordance with project scope or delivery dates. O*NET Task ID 14645	1.0
Review software documentation to ensure technical accuracy, compliance, or completeness, or to mitigate risks. O*NET Task ID 14647	1.0
Document test procedures to ensure replicability and compliance with standards. O*NET Task ID 14648	1.0
Develop or specify standards, methods, or procedures to determine product quality or release readiness. O*NET Task ID 14649	1.0
Update automated test scripts to ensure currency. O*NET Task ID 14650	1.0
Install, maintain, or use software testing programs. O*NET Task ID 14652	1.0
Provide feedback and recommendations to developers on software usability and functionality. O*NET Task ID 14653	1.0
Monitor program performance to ensure efficient and problem-free operations. O*NET Task ID 14654	1.0
Conduct software compatibility tests with programs, hardware, operating systems, or network environments. O*NET Task ID 14655	1.0
Install and configure recreations of software production environments to allow testing of software performance. O*NET Task ID 14656	1.0
Identify program deviance from standards, and suggest modifications to ensure compliance. O*NET Task ID 14658	1.0
Design or develop automated testing tools. O*NET Task ID 14659	1.0
Perform initial debugging procedures by reviewing configuration files, logs, or code pieces to determine breakdown source. O*NET Task ID 14661	1.0
Evaluate or recommend software for testing or bug tracking. O*NET Task ID 14663	1.0
Conduct historical analyses of test results. O*NET Task ID 14664	1.0
Modify existing software to correct errors, allow it to adapt to new hardware, or to improve its performance. O*NET Task ID 21680	1.0
Store, retrieve, and manipulate data for analysis of system capabilities and requirements. O*NET Task ID 21682	1.0
Participate in product design reviews to provide input on functional requirements, product designs, schedules, or potential problems. O*NET Task ID 14646	0.5
Investigate customer problems referred by technical support. O*NET Task ID 14651	0.5
Collaborate with field staff or customers to evaluate or diagnose problems and recommend possible solutions. O*NET Task ID 14657	0.5
Coordinate user or third-party testing. O*NET Task ID 14660	0.5
他 18 件の作業を表示 ▾折りたたむ ▴
Visit beta testing sites to evaluate software performance. O*NET Task ID 14662	0.0
Recommend purchase of equipment to control dust, temperature, or humidity in area of system installation. O*NET Task ID 21681	0.0

β = E1 + 0.5 × E2 · E1 = tasks where direct LLM access alone cuts time by at least 50%, E2 = tasks where software built on top of an LLM cuts time by at least 50%. Values take only 0 / 0.5 / 1.0.

Data sources & licenses — O*NET®, Anthropic Economic Index, Eloundou et al. (2023): see full notices on the Credits page

O*NET 31.0 のタスク全件（30件）

この職業の O*NET 31.0 のタスク全件（英語原文、種別はコア・補足）。露出値はこの一覧には載せず、上の表で各出典が用いた O*NET 版の文言の横にあります。

タスク（O*NET 31.0）	種類
Design test plans, scenarios, scripts, or procedures.	コア
Test system modifications to prepare for implementation.	コア
Develop testing programs that address areas such as database impacts, software scenarios, regression testing, negative testing, error or bug retests, or usability.	コア
Document software defects, using a bug tracking system, and report defects to software developers.	コア
Identify, analyze, and document problems with program function, output, online screen, or content.	コア
Monitor bug resolution efforts and track successes.	コア
Create or maintain databases of known test defects.	コア
Plan test schedules or strategies in accordance with project scope or delivery dates.	コア
Participate in product design reviews to provide input on functional requirements, product designs, schedules, or potential problems.	コア
Review software documentation to ensure technical accuracy, compliance, or completeness, or to mitigate risks.	コア
Document test procedures to ensure replicability and compliance with standards.	コア
Develop or specify standards, methods, or procedures to determine product quality or release readiness.	コア
Update automated test scripts to ensure currency.	コア
Investigate customer problems referred by technical support.	コア
Install, maintain, or use software testing programs.	コア
Provide feedback and recommendations to developers on software usability and functionality.	コア
Monitor program performance to ensure efficient and problem-free operations.	コア
Conduct software compatibility tests with programs, hardware, operating systems, or network environments.	コア
Install and configure recreations of software production environments to allow testing of software performance.	コア
Collaborate with field staff or customers to evaluate or diagnose problems and recommend possible solutions.	コア
Identify program deviance from standards, and suggest modifications to ensure compliance.	コア
Design or develop automated testing tools.	コア
Coordinate user or third-party testing.	コア
Perform initial debugging procedures by reviewing configuration files, logs, or code pieces to determine breakdown source.	コア
Visit beta testing sites to evaluate software performance.	コア
Evaluate or recommend software for testing or bug tracking.	コア
Conduct historical analyses of test results.	コア
Modify existing software to correct errors, allow it to adapt to new hardware, or to improve its performance.	—
Recommend purchase of equipment to control dust, temperature, or humidity in area of system installation.	—
Store, retrieve, and manipulate data for analysis of system capabilities and requirements.	—

雇用見通し（BLS）

雇用者数、2025: 188K
雇用者数見通し、2035: 198K
変化率 (2025–35): +5.7%
年間賃金の中央値、2025: $104,300
入職時に通常必要な学歴: Bachelor's degree

最低 $30,890BLS EP 2025–35 の詳細職業825件の賃金中央値の範囲最高 $559,030

出典: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Projections 2025–35 — Employment by detailed occupation, 2025 and projected 2035

韓国職業分類との対応（KSCO）

AI Changing Work が作成した Korea Occupation Direct Crosswalk v1.1 現行版の対応です。関係の値は O*NET-SOC 職業の側から読みます。

KSCO コード	KSCO 名称	関係	状態
22291	소프트웨어 품질관리 전문가	この職業のほうが広い	確定
22299	그 외 컴퓨터 시스템 및 소프트웨어 전문가	この職業のほうが広い	確定

関係と状態の定義(kr-direct v1.1)

ILO（国際労働機関）の職業説明

以下のISCO-08職業群は、AI Changing Workが米国労働統計局（BLS）の発行するクロスウォーク（2018 SOC→2010 SOC、2010 SOC→ISCO-08）を個別の選択なしにそのまま適用して、この職業に結び付けたものです。結び付きは全体的な対応の場合も部分的な対応の場合もあります。

ISCO-08 2512Software Developers
ソフトウェア開発者
ISCO-08 2519Software and Applications Developers and Analysts Not Elsewhere Classified
他に分類されないソフトウェア・アプリケーション開発者、アナリスト
ISCO-08 2529Database and Network Professionals Not Elsewhere Classified
他に分類されないデータベース・ネットワーク専門職

出典: 総務省「国際標準職業分類（ISCO）2008年改定版（仮訳）分類項目名一覧（和英対照）」— 原著：ILO ISCO-08 © International Labour Organization（日本語訳は総務省がILOの許可を得て作成）

原文を見る

Sources: ILO ISCO-08 — details: Credits

ESCO 職業語彙

以下の各項目は、公開されているESCO-O*NET Crosswalk（バージョン1、2022年）で、この職業と一つずつ対応付けられたものです。対応の種類はそのクロスウォークによるもので、表現はAI Changing Workによるものです。

software testerESCO 2519.6範囲が同じ
Software testers perform software tests. They may also plan and design them. They may also debug and repair software although this mainly corresponds to designers and developers. They ensure that applications function properly before delivering them to internal and external clients.
digital games testerESCO 2519.6.1この職業のほうが広い
Digital games testers review and test various genres of digital games by playing them in order to find bugs and glitches within the game's functionality or graphics. They may evaluate the capacity of attraction and playability of games. They may also debug the games themselves.
ICT accessibility testerESCO 2519.6.2この職業のほうが広い
ICT accessibility testers evaluate websites, software applications, systems or user interface components with regards to friendliness, operability of the navigation and visibility to all types of users, especially including those with special needs or disabilities.
ICT integration testerESCO 2519.6.3この職業のほうが広い
ICT integration testers perform tests in groups of system components, units or even applications. They group them in larger aggregates and apply integration test plans on them. They oversee the complexity of relations between different components.
ICT system testerESCO 2519.6.4この職業のほうが広い
ICT system testers perform testing activities and some test planning activities. They may also debug and repair ICT systems and components although this mainly corresponds to designers and developers. They ensure that all systems and components function properly before delivering them to internal and external clients.
ICT usability testerESCO 2519.6.5この職業のほうが広い
ICT usability testers ensure compliance with requirements and strive for optimal usability within the software engineering cycle phases (analysis, design, implementation, and deployment). They also work closely with users (analysts) to research for and document user profiles, analyse tasks, workflows, and user scenarios.
ICT test analystESCO 2519.5重なるが同じではない
ICT test analysts work in testing environments, assessing products, checking for quality and accuracy, or creating tests scripts. They design tests which are then implemented by testers.
software developerESCO 2512.3重なるが同じではない
Software developers implement or program all kinds of software systems based on specifications and designs by using programming languages, tools, and platforms.

出典: European Commission, DG EMPL — ESCO API 2026-08-08 (bridge v1.2.1)

ライセンス: CC BY 4.0 (EU Reuse Notice)

原文を見る

ESCO reuse terms and the modification notice are in Credits.

フランス職業分類との対応（ROME）

この職業と ROME 4.0 の職業票（fiche）との対応で、AI Changing Work が AI モデルを用いて判定したものです。関係はこの職業の側から読みます。「暫定」と表示した対応は、同じモデル系列（Claude）の二人の判定者による判定のみ、またはその判定に運営者の規則を適用して採用したものであり、確定した対応より根拠が弱くなります。

ROME コード	ROME 名称（フランス語）	関係
M1815	Spécialiste test et validation logiciel ou application	範囲が同じ暫定
M1820	Expert / Experte méthodes et qualité informatique	この職業のほうが広い暫定
M1832	Homologateur / Homologatrice fonctionnel de logiciel	この職業のほうが広い暫定
M1842	Qualiticien / Qualiticienne logiciel en informatique	重なるが同じではない暫定

Source: France Travail — Répertoire Opérationnel des Métiers et des Emplois (ROME 4.0), version 61, last updated 15 June 2026 (https://www.data.gouv.fr/datasets/repertoire-operationnel-des-metiers-et-des-emplois-rome). Licence Ouverte 2.0.

ROME codes and titles are reproduced unchanged; the links to O*NET-SOC occupations are AI Changing Work's own judgment and are not a France Travail correspondence.

(AI Changing Work link release: fr-direct v1)

スペイン職業分類との対応（CNO-11）

この職業と CNO-11 の職業との対応で、AI Changing Work が AI モデルを用いて判定したものです。関係はこの職業の側から読みます。

CNO-11 コード	CNO-11 名称（スペイン語）	関係
2719	Analistas y diseñadores de software y multimedia no clasificados bajo otros epígrafes	この職業のほうが狭い
2712	Analistas y diseñadores de software	関連（対応ではない）

Source: Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE), National Classification of Occupations 2011 (CNO-11, Royal Decree 1591/2010) — www.ine.es · Licensed CC BY 4.0. CNO-11 codes and Spanish titles are reproduced unchanged; the links to O*NET occupations are AI Changing Work's own judgment and are not an INE correspondence.

(AI Changing Work link release: es-direct v1)

ドイツ職業分類との対応（KldB）

この職業と KldB の職業との対応で、AI Changing Work が AI モデルを用いて判定したものです。関係はこの職業の側から読みます。

KldB コード	KldB 名称（ドイツ語）	関係
43323	Berufe in der IT-Koordination - komplexe Spezialistentätigkeiten	この職業のほうが狭い暫定

Source: © Statistik der Bundesagentur für Arbeit — Klassifikation der Berufe 2010 – überarbeitete Fassung 2020, https://statistik.arbeitsagentur.de. KldB codes and titles are reproduced unchanged; the links to O*NET occupations are AI Changing Work's own mapping (eigene Zuordnung) and are not a Bundesagentur für Arbeit correspondence.

(AI Changing Work link release: de-direct v1)

日本職業分類との対応（JSCO）

この職業と JSCO の職業との対応で、AI Changing Work が AI モデルを用いて判定したものです。関係はこの職業の側から読みます。

JSCO コード	JSCO 名称（日本語）	関係
104	ソフトウェア作成者	この職業のほうが狭い暫定

Source: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (MIC), Japan Standard Occupational Classification (Dec. 2009, MIC Notification No. 555). JSCO codes and Japanese titles are reproduced unchanged; the links to O*NET occupations are AI Changing Work's own judgment and are not a MIC correspondence.

(AI Changing Work link release: jp-direct v1)

このページのデータの出典・ライセンスと AI Changing Work による改変・翻訳の告知：クレジットと出典