金融审查员
商业与金融AI暴露度
- 数据来源: BLS发布时间: '26.08
很高· 相对
低四级相对区间很高职业群单位数值
尺度 · 母数 · 来源
四级相对类别（低 / 中等 / 高 / 很高）
以BLS就业预测表中831个细分职业为基数。取值按 NEM（全国就业矩阵）代码给定，因此共用同一 NEM 代码的职业得到相同分档
- 数据来源: Anthropic发布时间: '26.03
0.043
0.000此处所载数值的范围0.745尺度 · 母数 · 来源
- 数据来源: ILO发布时间: '25
0.62
0.09此处所载数值的范围0.70职业群单位数值
尺度 · 母数 · 来源
生成式AI暴露度指数，按发布原值0–1
ISCO-08职业小类单位 — 共用同一代码的职业取值相同
本站计算，并非国际劳工组织发布的数值。在本站与 ILO 数据集相连的 1,012 个职业中，达到或高于此值的占 3%。
该来源发布的是什么性质的数值
BLS的类别是相对排位而非绝对水平，也不是一手测量：它把多项已发表研究给出的职业百分位排名归并为四个等级。它不是就业或工资预测，不是采用概率，也不区分自动化与增强。
Task-level exposure
仅显示有暴露的工作| Task | Claude.aiRaw / share % | APIRaw / share % |
|---|---|---|
Review and analyze new, proposed, or revised laws, regulations, policies, and procedures to interpret their meaning and determine their impact.13-2061 | 0.045690.1 | 0.0287100.0 |
Prepare reports, exhibits and other supporting schedules that detail an institution's safety and soundness, compliance with laws and regulations, and recommended solutions to questionable financial conditions.13-2061 | 0.00326.3 | —0 |
Recommend actions to ensure compliance with laws and regulations, or to protect solvency of institutions.13-2061 | 0.00183.6 | —0 |
| Not observed on any surface — 14 task(s) — These tasks have no row in the source for this release. The 0 in the share row is a display-stage composition ratio; absence is what the — in the raw row states. | ||
Investigate activities of institutions to enforce laws and regulations and to ensure legality of transactions and operations or financial solvency. | —0 | —0 |
Plan, supervise, and review work of assigned subordinates. | —0 | —0 |
Examine the minutes of meetings of directors, stockholders and committees to investigate the specific authority extended at various levels of management. | —0 | —0 |
Review balance sheets, operating income and expense accounts, and loan documentation to confirm institution assets and liabilities. | —0 | —0 |
Review audit reports of internal and external auditors to monitor adequacy of scope of reports or to discover specific weaknesses in internal routines. | —0 | —0 |
Train other examiners in the financial examination process. | —0 | —0 |
Establish guidelines for procedures and policies that comply with new and revised regulations and direct their implementation. | —0 | —0 |
Direct and participate in formal and informal meetings with bank directors, trustees, senior management, counsels, outside accountants and consultants to gather information and discuss findings. | —0 | —0 |
Verify and inspect cash reserves, assigned collateral, and bank-owned securities to check internal control procedures. | —0 | —0 |
Review applications for mergers, acquisitions, establishment of new institutions, acceptance in Federal Reserve System, or registration of securities sales to determine their public interest value and conformance to regulations, and recommend acceptance or rejection. | —0 | —0 |
Resolve problems concerning the overall financial integrity of banking institutions including loan investment portfolios, capital, earnings, and specific or large troubled accounts. | —0 | —0 |
Evaluate data processing applications for institutions under examination to develop recommendations for coordinating existing systems with examination procedures. | —0 | —0 |
Confer with officials of real estate, securities, or financial institution industries to exchange views and discuss issues or pending cases. | —0 | —0 |
Provide regulatory compliance training to employees. | —0 | —0 |
Values in this tab are predicted labels, not observations. Eloundou et al. (2023) published two rating regimes — human raters and GPT-4 — and the β shown here is derived from the GPT-4 rater basis alone; the same task can take a different value under the other regime. The unit and the meaning differ from the observed shares (%) in the other tabs, so do not place them on the same axis.
| Task | βE1 + 0.5 × E2 |
|---|---|
Train other examiners in the financial examination process.O*NET Task ID 7322 | 1.0 |
Investigate activities of institutions to enforce laws and regulations and to ensure legality of transactions and operations or financial solvency.O*NET Task ID 7314 | 0.5 |
Review and analyze new, proposed, or revised laws, regulations, policies, and procedures to interpret their meaning and determine their impact.O*NET Task ID 7315 | 0.5 |
Plan, supervise, and review work of assigned subordinates.O*NET Task ID 7316 | 0.5 |
Recommend actions to ensure compliance with laws and regulations, or to protect solvency of institutions.O*NET Task ID 7317 | 0.5 |
Examine the minutes of meetings of directors, stockholders, and committees to investigate the specific authority extended at various levels of management.O*NET Task ID 7318 | 0.5 |
Prepare reports, exhibits, and other supporting schedules that detail an institution's safety and soundness, compliance with laws and regulations, and recommended solutions to questionable financial conditions.O*NET Task ID 7319 | 0.5 |
Review balance sheets, operating income and expense accounts, and loan documentation to confirm institution assets and liabilities.O*NET Task ID 7320 | 0.5 |
Review audit reports of internal and external auditors to monitor adequacy of scope of reports or to discover specific weaknesses in internal routines.O*NET Task ID 7321 | 0.5 |
Establish guidelines for procedures and policies that comply with new and revised regulations and direct their implementation.O*NET Task ID 7323 | 0.5 |
Direct and participate in formal and informal meetings with bank directors, trustees, senior management, counsels, outside accountants, and consultants to gather information and discuss findings.O*NET Task ID 7324 | 0.0 |
β = E1 + 0.5 × E2 · E1 = tasks where direct LLM access alone cuts time by at least 50%, E2 = tasks where software built on top of an LLM cuts time by at least 50%. Values take only 0 / 0.5 / 1.0.
Data sources & licenses — O*NET®, Anthropic Economic Index, Eloundou et al. (2023): see full notices on the Credits page
Occupation information
与本职业相关的近期变化
2026年4月: ATE 0.42 by 2027 in SF Bay Tier 1. Part of the 91.7% of financial occupations crossing moderate-risk threshold in Tier 1 by 2027.
[来源: arXiv 2604.00186 (Gupta & Kumar, 2026)]2026年3月: Published evergreen blog analysis: AI exposure 63%, automation risk 46/100 in 2025.
[来源: AI Changing Work Blog]