Judicial Law Clerks
LegalAI exposure
- Data source: BLSPublished: 2026-08
High· relative
LowFour relative bandsVery highGroup-level value
Scale, basis and source
Four relative bands (Low / Moderate / High / Very high)
831 detailed occupations in the BLS Employment Projections table. Assigned per National Employment Matrix (NEM) code, so occupations sharing a NEM code carry the same band
- Data source: AnthropicPublished: 2026-03
0.170
0.000Range of values carried here0.745Scale, basis and source
- Data source: ILOPublished: 2025
0.39
0.09Range of values carried here0.70Group-level value
Scale, basis and source
Generative AI exposure index, 0–1 as published
ISCO-08 unit group — every occupation sharing the code gets this value
Computed by this site, not published by the ILO: of the 1,012 occupations this site links to the ILO dataset, 44% score at or above this value.
What kind of figure this source publishes
The BLS category is a relative rank, not an absolute level, and it is not a first-hand measurement: it groups an occupation's percentile ranks across several published studies into four bands. It is not an employment or wage forecast, not a probability of adoption, and it does not separate automation from augmentation.
Task-level exposure
Show 15 hidden tasks| Task | Claude.aiRaw / share % |
|---|---|
Prepare briefs, legal memoranda, or statements of issues involved in cases, including appropriate suggestions or recommendations.23-1012 | 0.009244.5 |
Review complaints, petitions, motions, or pleadings that have been filed to determine issues involved or basis for relief.23-1012 | 0.004019.5 |
Draft or proofread judicial opinions, decisions, or citations.23-1012 | 0.003919.0 |
Research laws, court decisions, documents, opinions, briefs, or other information related to cases before the court.23-1012 | 0.003517.0 |
Values in this tab are predicted labels, not observations. Eloundou et al. (2023) published two rating regimes — human raters and GPT-4 — and the β shown here is derived from the GPT-4 rater basis alone; the same task can take a different value under the other regime. The unit and the meaning differ from the observed shares (%) in the other tabs, so do not place them on the same axis.
| Task | βE1 + 0.5 × E2 |
|---|---|
Draft or proofread judicial opinions, decisions, or citations.O*NET Task ID 19047 | 1.0 |
Verify that all files, complaints, or other papers are available and in the proper order.O*NET Task ID 19054 | 1.0 |
Enter information into computerized court calendar, filing, or case management systems.O*NET Task ID 19057 | 1.0 |
Attend court sessions to hear oral arguments or record necessary case information.O*NET Task ID 19044 | 0.5 |
Communicate with counsel regarding case management or procedural requirements.O*NET Task ID 19045 | 0.5 |
Confer with judges concerning legal questions, construction of documents, or granting of orders.O*NET Task ID 19046 | 0.5 |
Keep abreast of changes in the law and inform judges when cases are affected by such changes.O*NET Task ID 19048 | 0.5 |
Prepare briefs, legal memoranda, or statements of issues involved in cases, including appropriate suggestions or recommendations.O*NET Task ID 19050 | 0.5 |
Research laws, court decisions, documents, opinions, briefs, or other information related to cases before the court.O*NET Task ID 19051 | 0.5 |
Review complaints, petitions, motions, or pleadings that have been filed to determine issues involved or basis for relief.O*NET Task ID 19052 | 0.5 |
β = E1 + 0.5 × E2 · E1 = tasks where direct LLM access alone cuts time by at least 50%, E2 = tasks where software built on top of an LLM cuts time by at least 50%. Values take only 0 / 0.5 / 1.0.
Data sources & licenses — O*NET®, Anthropic Economic Index, Eloundou et al. (2023): see full notices on the Credits page