法官
法律AI暴露度
- 数据来源: BLS发布时间: 2026-08
高· 相对
低四级相对区间很高职业群单位数值
尺度 · 母数 · 来源
四级相对类别（低 / 中等 / 高 / 很高）
以BLS就业预测表中831个细分职业为基数。取值按 NEM（全国就业矩阵）代码给定，因此共用同一 NEM 代码的职业得到相同分档
- 数据来源: Anthropic发布时间: 2026-03
0.311
0.000此处所载数值的范围0.745尺度 · 母数 · 来源
- 数据来源: ILO发布时间: 2025
0.31
0.09此处所载数值的范围0.70职业群单位数值
尺度 · 母数 · 来源
生成式AI暴露度指数，按发布原值0–1
ISCO-08职业小类单位 — 共用同一代码的职业取值相同
本站计算，并非国际劳工组织发布的数值。在本站与 ILO 数据集相连的 1,012 个职业中，达到或高于此值的占 65%。
该来源发布的是什么性质的数值
BLS的类别是相对排位而非绝对水平，也不是一手测量：它把多项已发表研究给出的职业百分位排名归并为四个等级。它不是就业或工资预测，不是采用概率，也不区分自动化与增强。
Task-level exposure
显示隐藏的 17 项工作| Task | Claude.aiRaw / share % | APIRaw / share % |
|---|---|---|
Write decisions on cases.23-1023 | 0.015654.3 | —0 |
Research legal issues and write opinions on the issues.23-1023 | 0.008529.7 | 0.0035100.0 |
Read documents on pleadings and motions to ascertain facts and issues.23-1023 | 0.004615.9 | —0 |
Values in this tab are predicted labels, not observations. Eloundou et al. (2023) published two rating regimes — human raters and GPT-4 — and the β shown here is derived from the GPT-4 rater basis alone; the same task can take a different value under the other regime. The unit and the meaning differ from the observed shares (%) in the other tabs, so do not place them on the same axis.
| Task | βE1 + 0.5 × E2 |
|---|---|
Sentence defendants in criminal cases, on conviction by jury, according to applicable government statutes.O*NET Task ID 5644 | 0.5 |
Rule on admissibility of evidence and methods of conducting testimony.O*NET Task ID 5645 | 0.5 |
Preside over hearings and listen to allegations made by plaintiffs to determine whether the evidence supports the charges.O*NET Task ID 5646 | 0.5 |
Read documents on pleadings and motions to ascertain facts and issues.O*NET Task ID 5647 | 0.5 |
Interpret and enforce rules of procedure or establish new rules in situations where there are no procedures already established by law.O*NET Task ID 5648 | 0.5 |
Monitor proceedings to ensure that all applicable rules and procedures are followed.O*NET Task ID 5649 | 0.5 |
Advise attorneys, juries, litigants, and court personnel regarding conduct, issues, and proceedings.O*NET Task ID 5650 | 0.5 |
Research legal issues and write opinions on the issues.O*NET Task ID 5651 | 0.5 |
Conduct preliminary hearings to decide issues, such as whether there is reasonable and probable cause to hold defendants in felony cases.O*NET Task ID 5652 | 0.5 |
Write decisions on cases.O*NET Task ID 5653 | 0.5 |
β = E1 + 0.5 × E2 · E1 = tasks where direct LLM access alone cuts time by at least 50%, E2 = tasks where software built on top of an LLM cuts time by at least 50%. Values take only 0 / 0.5 / 1.0.
Data sources & licenses — O*NET®, Anthropic Economic Index, Eloundou et al. (2023): see full notices on the Credits page
职业信息
与本职业相关的近期变化
2026年3月: Same paper assigns ATE 0.43 by 2027 in SF Bay Tier 1. 100% of legal occupations in scope cross moderate-risk threshold by 2027 in Tier 1; only 14.3% cross in Tier 3 (New York) by 2030.
[来源: arXiv 2604.00186 (Gupta & Kumar, 2026)]2026年3月: ATE framework identifies judges among highest-risk occupations (ATE 0.43-0.47) for agentic AI displacement — AI systems increasingly capable of end-to-end legal reasoning workflows.
[来源: Gupta & Kumar (2026) Agentic AI and Occupational Displacement]These summaries were written by AI Changing Work from the source linked with each one, and any figures in them are given as AI Changing Work summarised them; they can differ from the source's own wording and from figures shown elsewhere on this page, so check the source before relying on them. AI Changing Work matched this page's occupation to an O*NET occupation and chose, by its own judgment, case by case, which summaries relate to that O*NET occupation; a summary appearing here does not mean that its source names this occupation.