소프트웨어 품질 보증 분석가 및 테스터
컴퓨터·수학직Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers
- O*NET-SOC 코드
- 15-1253.00
Develop and execute software tests to identify software problems and their causes. Test system modifications to prepare for implementation. Document software and application defects using a bug tracking system and report defects to software or web developers. Create and maintain databases of known defects. May participate in software design reviews to provide input on functional requirements, operational characteristics, product designs, and schedules.
한국어 직업명은 AI Changing Work의 번역입니다. 과업 문장과 원천 값은 공표된 영문 그대로 표시합니다.
AI 노출도
- 데이터 출처: BLS발행 시점: 2026-08
매우 높음· 상대
낮음4단계 상대 범주매우 높음직업군 단위 값
척도 · 모수 · 출처
4단계 상대 범주 (낮음 / 보통 / 높음 / 매우 높음)
BLS 고용전망 표의 세부직업 831개 기준. 값은 NEM(전국고용매트릭스) 코드 단위로 부여되므로, 같은 NEM 코드를 쓰는 직업은 같은 밴드를 받습니다
- 데이터 출처: Anthropic발행 시점: 2026-03
0.519
0.000여기 실린 값의 범위0.745척도 · 모수 · 출처
관측 노출 지수, 발행된 그대로 0–1
O*NET 과업 매핑 기준
SOC 2018 직업 단위로 발행된 값이며, 같은 SOC 2018 코드를 가진 O*NET 직업은 모두 이 값을 받습니다
- 데이터 출처: ILO발행 시점: 2025
0.49–0.55· ISCO-08 직업군 3개
척도 · 모수 · 출처
생성형 AI 노출 지수, 발행된 그대로 0–1
ISCO-08 직업군 단위로 발행된 값입니다. 미국 노동통계국(BLS)의 공식 교차표(ISCO-08→2010 SOC, 2010 SOC→2018 SOC)를 그대로 적용해 이 직업에 연결했으며, 연결은 전부 또는 일부 대응입니다
이 원천이 어떤 종류의 값인가
BLS 범주는 절대 수준이 아니라 상대 순위이며, 1차 측정도 아닙니다. 여러 선행 연구가 매긴 직업별 백분위 순위를 4단계로 묶은 값입니다. 고용·임금 예측도, 도입 확률도 아니며 자동화와 증강을 구분하지 않습니다.
연결된 ISCO-08 직업군별 ILO 값
- ISCO-08 2512Software Developers0.53
- ISCO-08 2519Software and Applications Developers and Analysts Not Elsewhere Classified0.55
- ISCO-08 2529Database and Network Professionals Not Elsewhere Classified0.49
AI 노출도 (OpenAI 루브릭)
평가 과업 30개 · β ≥ 0.5 인 과업 28개 (93.3%)
β = 직접 노출(E1) + 0.5 × 도구 활용 시 노출(E2). 원본 저장소의 정의를 따릅니다.
- 원천 단위: O*NET 27.2 과업 → O*NET 31.0 직업 코드
- 채점된 과업이 모두 O*NET 31.0 과업 목록에 있습니다.
- 출처
- OpenAI "GPTs are GPTs" exposure rubric
- 판
- gh-main-0471612
- 라이선스
- MIT License, Copyright (c) 2024 OpenAI
과업
O*NET® 31.0 Database의 과업 문장입니다. 핵심(Core) 과업을 먼저 보입니다.
| 과업 | 유형 | β (OpenAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Design test plans, scenarios, scripts, or procedures. | 핵심 | 1 |
| Test system modifications to prepare for implementation. | 핵심 | 1 |
| Develop testing programs that address areas such as database impacts, software scenarios, regression testing, negative testing, error or bug retests, or usability. | 핵심 | 1 |
| Document software defects, using a bug tracking system, and report defects to software developers. | 핵심 | 1 |
| Identify, analyze, and document problems with program function, output, online screen, or content. | 핵심 | 1 |
| Monitor bug resolution efforts and track successes. | 핵심 | 1 |
| Create or maintain databases of known test defects. | 핵심 | 1 |
| Plan test schedules or strategies in accordance with project scope or delivery dates. | 핵심 | 1 |
| Participate in product design reviews to provide input on functional requirements, product designs, schedules, or potential problems. | 핵심 | 0.5 |
| Review software documentation to ensure technical accuracy, compliance, or completeness, or to mitigate risks. | 핵심 | 1 |
| Document test procedures to ensure replicability and compliance with standards. | 핵심 | 1 |
| Develop or specify standards, methods, or procedures to determine product quality or release readiness. | 핵심 | 1 |
| Update automated test scripts to ensure currency. | 핵심 | 1 |
| Investigate customer problems referred by technical support. | 핵심 | 0.5 |
| Install, maintain, or use software testing programs. | 핵심 | 1 |
| Provide feedback and recommendations to developers on software usability and functionality. | 핵심 | 1 |
| Monitor program performance to ensure efficient and problem-free operations. | 핵심 | 1 |
| Conduct software compatibility tests with programs, hardware, operating systems, or network environments. | 핵심 | 1 |
| Install and configure recreations of software production environments to allow testing of software performance. | 핵심 | 1 |
| Collaborate with field staff or customers to evaluate or diagnose problems and recommend possible solutions. | 핵심 | 0.5 |
| Identify program deviance from standards, and suggest modifications to ensure compliance. | 핵심 | 1 |
| Design or develop automated testing tools. | 핵심 | 1 |
| Coordinate user or third-party testing. | 핵심 | 0.5 |
| Perform initial debugging procedures by reviewing configuration files, logs, or code pieces to determine breakdown source. | 핵심 | 1 |
| Visit beta testing sites to evaluate software performance. | 핵심 | 0 |
| Evaluate or recommend software for testing or bug tracking. | 핵심 | 1 |
| Conduct historical analyses of test results. | 핵심 | 1 |
| Modify existing software to correct errors, allow it to adapt to new hardware, or to improve its performance. | — | 1 |
| Recommend purchase of equipment to control dust, temperature, or humidity in area of system installation. | — | 0 |
| Store, retrieve, and manipulate data for analysis of system capabilities and requirements. | — | 1 |
직업 정보
출처와 귀속
This page includes information from the O*NET® 31.0 Database (https://www.onetcenter.org/database.html) by the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (USDOL/ETA). Used under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). O*NET® is a trademark of USDOL/ETA. AI Changing Work has modified all or some of this information: the O*NET-SOC code, title and task statements are reproduced in English without change; task-type labels are shown in the page's language and tasks are listed core first; any Korean occupation title shown on the Korean-language page is AI Changing Work's translation; any KSCO-8 unit groups linked to this occupation were paired with it by AI Changing Work's judgment, and the relation labels and statuses are AI Changing Work's additions. USDOL/ETA has not approved, endorsed, or tested these modifications.
Any AI exposure figures on this page are published by third parties, not by AI Changing Work, and none is part of the O*NET information. OpenAI publishes task-level scores (MIT License) for O*NET 27.2 task statements; each is shown next to the O*NET 31.0 task statement with the same task ID, whose wording can differ from the 27.2 statement that was scored. OpenAI also publishes occupation-level scores for O*NET-SOC codes in the same release, and any such score is shown on the O*NET occupation with the same code. Anthropic publishes an observed exposure index in the Anthropic Economic Index (CC-BY), and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes relative AI exposure categories (public domain); both are published per SOC code, and each value is shown on every O*NET occupation with that code. The International Labour Organization publishes a generative AI exposure index in ILO Working Paper 140 (CC BY 4.0) for ISCO-08 unit groups; AI Changing Work links those groups to O*NET occupations by applying the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics ISCO-08 to 2010 SOC and 2010 SOC to 2018 SOC crosswalks as published, without case-by-case selection, and these crosswalks match many groups only in part. Where several unit groups are linked, each group's published value is listed, and any summary shows only the lowest and highest of those values with the number of groups; no exposure figure is averaged or recalculated. Any employment figures are published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics for the SOC group containing this occupation. Each source is credited where its figures are shown.
O*NET OnLine: 15-1253.00 Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers
KSCO 코드·명칭: 한국표준직업분류(제8차 개정) — 통계청 고시 제2024-328호 (2024-07-01 고시, 2025-01-01 시행). 저작권법 제7조 제2호의 고시 항목이다. 명칭 표기(가운뎃점·띄어쓰기)는 해설서 2차 정오 반영판의 표기를 따랐으며, 고시 항목표와는 18개 명칭에서 가운뎃점 글리프나 띄어쓰기만 다르다. 통계청은 2025년 10월 국가데이터처로 개편되었다. 이 페이지의 KSCO 연결은 통계청·국가데이터처의 공식 연계표가 아니다.